Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 20: e211670, jan.-dez. 2021. ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1254259

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the effect of different surface treatments and adhesive approaches on the microshear bond strength of resin cement to a polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN). Methods: PICN blocks were randomly assigned into 9 groups (n=10): CTRL: no treatment; HF: 5% hydrofluoric acid etching; HF-S: HF + silane; HF-S-A: HF-S + adhesive (Adper Single Bond 2); HF-UA: HF + universal adhesive (Single Bond Universal); SB: sandblasting with 50 µm Al2O3 particles; SB-S: SB + silane; SB-S-A: SB-S + adhesive; SB-UA: SB + universal adhesive. Resin cement microcylinders (Ø = 0.96 mm; height = 1 mm) (RelyX Ultimate) were built upon the PICN surface after roughness and contact angle measurements. Next, microshear bonding tests (µSBS) were performed (0.5 mm/min) after water storage (37ºC, 90 days) and thermocycling (12,000 cycles; 5ºC-55ºC). Failure modes were observed under stereomicroscope. Bond strength data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA/Tukey's test and t-tests. Kruskal-Wallis/Dunn's tests were conducted for roughness and contact angle data (α = 0.05). Results: A rougher surface and lower contact angles were observed for Sandblasting. HF-S (18.54 ± 2.03 MPa), SB-S (19.00 ± 1.66 MPa) and SB-UA (18.07 ± 2.36 MPa) provided the highest bond strength values, followed by the other treated groups. The CTRL group resulted in lower bond strength (7.18 ± 2.34 MPa). Conclusion: Hydrofluoric acid etching followed by silane application and sandblasting followed by silane or universal adhesive are useful clinical steps to enhance bonding to PICN. Adhesive applications after HF etching have no advantages in bonding to PICN


Subject(s)
Surface Properties , Ceramics , Dentin-Bonding Agents , Resin Cements , Air Abrasion, Dental , Hydrofluoric Acid
2.
Braz. j. oral sci ; 19: e208798, jan.-dez. 2020. ilus
Article in English | BBO, LILACS | ID: biblio-1152180

ABSTRACT

Aim: To evaluate the retention of an endodontic titanium postwith a spherical head for removable partial denture or overdentureattachment according to surface treatment type. Methods: Sixtyhealthy single-rooted teeth, sectioned at the enamel/cementumjunction, were treated endodontically and steadily fixed in theembedding acrylic resin. The titanium posts were subdivided intofour groups: control, no surface treatment (Ctrl); posts with macroretentivegrooves (MR); air abrasion of the post surface (AB); andposts with macro-retentive grooves and air abrasion of the postsurface (MR+AB). The posts were luted in the root canal usingself-adhesive dual resin cement. Pull-out testing was performedusing a universal testing machine until complete detachment wasachieved. After pull-out testing, the metallic posts were examinedunder an optical microscope and the failures were classifiedbased on the cement distribution pattern on the extracted posts:0, no cement left on the post (cement/post failure); 1, postsurface partially covered by adhered cement (post/cement anddentin/cement mixed failure); 2, post surface completely coveredby cement (dentin/cement failure). The retention data wereanalyzed by one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni­Dunn test (p<0.05)and Weibull analysis. Results: AB showed the highest retentionvalue (485.37±68.36), followed by MR+AB (355.80±118.47), MR(224.63±42.54) and Ctrl (113.12 ± 51.32). AB and MR showedthe highest Weibull moduli. Conclusions: The data indicatedthat air abrasion alone could significantly increase the retentionof titanium posts/attachments for use with overdentures orremovable partial denture


Subject(s)
Surface Properties , Denture Retention , Cementation , Air Abrasion, Dental , Titanium , Denture, Partial, Removable
3.
Braz. dent. sci ; 17(2): 70-76, 2014. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS, BBO | ID: lil-728126

ABSTRACT

Objetive: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of sandblasting distance on ceramic and enamelbond strength. Material & Methods: Sixtythird molars were selected, enamel surfaces were ground flat with wet 600 - 2000 grit aluminum oxide abrasive papers and polished with three, one, and one-fourth micrometer-grit diamond pastes. On hundred and twentylithium disilicate-based core ceramic discs (2 mm diameter; 1 mm thickness) were also obtained and further divided into 7 groups [Group C, no sandblasting, Group SB-E(5-10) enamel sandblasting - 5 and 10 mm of distance, Group SBC(5-10) ceramic sandblasting 5 mm and 10 mm of distance, Group SB-EC(5-10) enamel and ceramic sandblasting 5 mm and 10 mm of distance]. After treatments,shear and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) tests were performed.Data were analyzed by Statistic Tests of normality, one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test (α: 0.05). Results: Group C presented the highestbond strength values(59.2 ±12.5), while group SB-E 5 mm showed the lowest values (21.7 ± 08.8) (p < 0.005). Conclusion: The use of sandblasting treatment of enamel surface at 5mm distance decreases the bonding strength to shear.


Objetivo: o objetivo do estudo foi avaliar influência do jateamento na estrutura cerâmica e esmalte sob resistência de união, mudando a distância. Materiais e Métodos: 60 terceiros molares, foram selecionados, superfícies de esmalte foram planificadas com lixa com grão 600 - 2000 lixas e polido com pastas de diamante de um grão -micrômetro. Obtidos 120 discos cerâmica em dissilicato de lítio de (2 mm de diâmetro e 1 mm de espessura), dividido em sete grupos [Grupo C, não jateamento, Grupo SB-E (5-10) esmalte jateamento 5 e 10 mm, Grupo SB -C (5-10) de jacto de areia cerâmica 5 mm e 10 mm, Grupo SB-CE (5-10) e esmalte cerâmico areação 5 milímetros e 10 mm], depois foi realizado o microcisalhamento e a microscopia de forca atômica (AFM), estatística como Teste de Normalidade , após análise de variância one-way e teste de Tukey (α: 0,05). Resultados: A força do grupo C apresentou maiores valores de resistência de união (59,2 ± 12,5), o grupo SB-E 5 mm (21,7 ± 08,8) (p < 0,005), o grupo SB-E10 (53,6 ± 14,3). Conclusão: o uso de jateamento tratamento da superfície do esmalte de 5 mm, de 20 s diminui a força de ligação de microcisalhamento.


Subject(s)
Air Abrasion, Dental , Aluminum Oxide , Shear Strength
4.
Braz. oral res ; 22(3): 235-241, 2008. ilus, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-495598

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of high speed (HS) and air abrasion (AA) instruments on groups of teeth (deciduous, permanent, bovine), in terms of preparation time, topography and presence of smear layer. Each group consisted of 5 teeth that had their buccal/lingual surfaces prepared by using either HS or AA. All procedures were standardized and timed. The teeth were then sectioned and prepared for evaluation of both the topography and the presence of smear layer by scanning electron microscopy. As regards preparation time, HS yielded preparations 1.5 times quicker than AA did on the three types of dental substrates (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05). In both techniques (Kruskal-Wallis Test, p < 0.05) the preparation time was influenced by the dental substrate, particularly in deciduous teeth (Mann-Whitney test with Bonferoni's correction, p < 0.017), which required a longer preparation time. In the descriptive analysis of the topography, no difference was found between the substrates. Nonetheless, the different instruments used determined distinctive topographies. Both techniques produced a smear layer (÷2 McNemar, p > 0.05) in all substrates, but with different formations. In conclusion, the HS instrument was found to be more rapid than the AA. No difference was found between the three dental substrates as regards both the topography and the presence of smear layer. The differences found in the present study were only in relation to the effects of each instrument used.


Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Air Abrasion, Dental/instrumentation , Dental Cavity Preparation/instrumentation , Dental High-Speed Equipment/standards , Dental Restoration, Permanent/instrumentation , Smear Layer , Tooth, Deciduous/physiology , Chi-Square Distribution , Dental Enamel/ultrastructure , Dentin/ultrastructure , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties
5.
Braz. oral res ; 22(2): 158-163, 2008. ilus
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-485956

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to qualitatively demonstrate surface micro-morphological changes after the employment of different surface conditioning methods on high-alumina and glassy-matrix dental ceramics. Three disc-shaped high-alumina specimens (In-Ceram Alumina, INC) and 4 glassy-matrix ceramic specimens (Vitadur Alpha, V) (diameter: 5 mm and height: 5 mm) were manufactured. INC specimens were submitted to 3 different surface conditioning methods: INC1 - Polishing with silicon carbide papers (SiC); INC2 - Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 µm Al2O3); INC3 - Chairside silica coating (CoJet; 30 µm SiOx). Vitadur Alpha (V) specimens were subjected to 4 different surface conditioning methods: V1 - Polishing with SiC papers; V2 - HF acid etching; V3 - Chairside air-borne particle abrasion (50 µm Al2O3); V4 - Chairside silica coating (30 µm SiOx). Following completion of the surface conditioning methods, the specimens were analyzed using SEM. After polishing with SiC, the surfaces of V specimens remained relatively smooth while those of INC exhibited topographic irregularities. Chairside air-abrasion with either aluminum oxide or silica particles produced retentive patterns on both INC and V specimens, with smoother patterns observed after silica coating. V specimens etched with HF presented a highly porous surface. Chairside tribochemical silica coating resulted in smoother surfaces with particles embedded on the surface even after air-blasting. Surface conditioning using air-borne particle abrasion with either 50 µm alumina or 30 µm silica particles exhibited qualitatively comparable rough surfaces for both INC and V. HF acid gel created the most micro-retentive surface for the glassy-matrix ceramic tested.


Subject(s)
Acid Etching, Dental/methods , Aluminum Oxide/chemistry , Ceramics/chemistry , Dental Bonding/methods , Resin Cements/chemistry , Air Abrasion, Dental , Cementation/methods , Materials Testing , Microscopy, Electron, Scanning , Surface Properties , Tensile Strength
6.
ROBRAC ; 16(42): 7-14, dez. 2007. graf, tab
Article in Portuguese | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: lil-525065

ABSTRACT

Nesse estudo, avaliou-se a deposição de partículas de óxido de alumínio no campo operatório do cirurgião-dentista durante o emprego de um aparelho de abrasão a ar e sucção odontológica convencional parasucção do pó gerado. Um dispositivo metálico, simulando as posições de trabalho do cirurgião-dentista,possibilitou a captação das partículas durante o abrasionamento de dentes artificiais. Sugadores de salivaconvencional e modificado por funil foram empregados no sistema de sucção convencional da equipe odontológicacom a finalidade de captar o pó de óxido de alumínio. Os resultados foram expressos por meio deanálise estatística gráfica em função da quantidade em massa de partículas de óxido de alumínio obtida emfunção da distância e posição de trabalho do operador ao centro da boca de um manequim. A maior deposiçãode partículas ocorreu a 20 cm de distância do operador em relação ao centro da boca e na posição detrabalho 9h, quando se empregou o sugador de saliva convencional.


In this study the aluminum oxide particle deposition was evaluated in the operatory position of the dentistduring an air abrasion system application with conventional dental suction (CDS) for the aspiration of thedust. A metallic device, simulating the operatory position of the dentist was used to particles deposition duringthe abrasion of an artificial tooth. A conventional saliva ejector and a modified ejector by funnel-shapedattachment were used in conventional dental suction (CDS) to dust suction. The results were expressed inaluminum oxide particles mass in relation to the operatory position and distance from operator to the centerof the mouth. Statistical graphical analysis showed that the greatest particle deposition occurred at 20cm ofdistance from the operator to the center of the mouth, in the 9 o'clock operator position when the conventionalsaliva ejector was used.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL